Modeling Physical Education as a Learning System: Regional and International Perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2026.7.1.01

Keywords:

physical education, learning system, learning theory, modeling, pedagogical control, adaptive learning, instructional design

Abstract

Background. Contemporary learning research increasingly conceptualizes educational processes as controllable, adaptive, and feedback-driven systems. Despite this shift, physical education is often treated as conceptually separate from general learning theory and predominantly interpreted as an applied or norm-oriented activity. Such a reduction limits opportunities for systemic analysis, instructional design, and the integration of formative assessment mechanisms.

Objectives. The purpose of this article is to reconceptualize physical education as a learning system from the perspective of learning theory and to analyze regional and international approaches to modeling learning processes and pedagogical regulation of learning outcomes.

Materials and Methods. The study was conducted as a narrative review. Its methodological basis is a conceptual analysis of monographic works and publications in peer-reviewed journals addressing learning process modeling, pedagogical control, adaptive learning, and instructional design in physical education. Source selection followed a conceptually oriented strategy aimed at identifying theoretically and empirically grounded models of learning systems.

Results. The analysis demonstrates that physical education can be interpreted as a structured learning system comprising learning goals, operationalized outcomes, feedback mechanisms, and regulatory pedagogical decisions. Learning outcomes are conceptualized as dynamic states of learning that change in response to instructional organization. Regional models illustrate how pedagogical control and the classification of learning states can be used to adapt instructional influences under conditions of learner heterogeneity.

Conclusions. Physical education can be regarded as a legitimate domain of learning theory capable of providing conceptually coherent and empirically grounded examples of controllable and adaptive learning systems. Integrating motor learning within the learning sciences expands opportunities for interdisciplinary analysis of learning processes and contributes to bridging cognitive, procedural, and physical domains of learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olha Ivashchenko, Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture

Department  of  Theory  and Methods of Physical Education
Klochkivska St, 99, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
ivashchenko.olha21@gmail.com

Oleg Khudolii, Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture

Department of Olympic and Professional Sports
Klochkivska St, 99, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
khudolii.oleg@gmail.com

Mykola Khudolii, Kharkiv State Academy of Physical Culture

Klochkivska St, 99, Kharkiv, 61022, Ukraine
khudolii.mykola88@gmail.com

References

Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academies Press.

Sawyer, R.K. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526

Schmidt, R.A., & Lee, T.D. (2019). Motor Learning and Performance: From Principles to Application (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.

Bailey, R. (2006). Physical Education and Sport in Schools: A Review of Benefits and Outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x

Kirk, D. (2010). Physical Education Futures. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874622

World Health Organization. (2020). WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. WHO.

van Sluijs, E.M. F., Ekelund, U., Crochemore-Silva, I., et al. (2021). Physical Activity Behaviours in Adolescence: Current Evidence and Opportunities for Intervention. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 5(7), 451-460.

OECD. (2019). Making Physical Education Dynamic and Inclusive for 2030: International Curriculum Analysis. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/7abe6b02-en

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing Teaching Through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.). (2013). Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol. 2). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784

Sfard, A. (1998). On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004

Greeno, J.G. (1998). The Situativity of Knowing, Learning, and Research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Illeris, K. (Ed.). (2018). Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists … in Their Own Words (2nd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147277

Merrill, M.D. (2002). First Principles of Instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024

Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1997). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311

Grant, M.J., & Booth, A. (2009). A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Green, B.N., Johnson, C.D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-Reviewed Journals: Secrets of the Trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6

Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and Education: Inquiries Into Learning, Teaching, and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

Mosston, M., & Ashworth, S. (2008). Teaching Physical Education (6th ed.). Pearson.

Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Nicol, D.J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Khudolii, O.M. (2019). Research Program: Modeling of Young Gymnasts’ Training Process. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 19(4), 168-178. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.4.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.4.02

Ivashchenko, O.V. (2016). Modeling the process of physical education of schoolchildren (Modeliuvannia protsesu fizychnoho vykhovannia shkoliariv). Kharkiv, Ukraine: OVS.

Ivashchenko, O. (2020). Research Program: Modeling of Motor Abilities Development and Teaching of Schoolchildren. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 20(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.05

Ivashchenko, O.V., Nosko, M.O., Nosko, Y.M., & Chernenko, S.O. (2019). Pattern Recognition: Description of Modes of Teaching Boys Aged 7 Throwing a Small Ball at a Vertical Target. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 19(3), 130-138. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.3.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.3.04

Iermakov, S., Khudolii, O., & Chupikhin, D. (2021). Discriminant Analysis: Impact of the Number of Repetitions on the Effectiveness of Teaching Boys Aged 7 Throwing a Small Ball . Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 2(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2021.2.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2021.2.04

Mugurdinova, I., & Iermakov, S. (2022). Pattern Recognition: Effectiveness of Teaching Boys Aged 14 the Press Headstand and Handstand. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 3(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2022.1.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2022.1.02

Khudolii, O., Kapkan, O., Harkusha, S., Marchenko, S., & Veremeenko, V. (2020). Motor Skills Development: Optimization of Teaching Boys Aged 15 Press Headstand and Handstand. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 20(1), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.06

Khudolii, O., Iermakov, S., & Bartik, P. (2020). Didactics: Methodological Basis of Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 1(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2020.1.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2020.1.01

Khudolii, M., Ivashchenko, O., & Khudolii, O. (2025). Fundamental Movement Skills Development in Children Aged 5-12: Theory, Evidence, and Pedagogical Models. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 25(6), 1456-1470. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2025.6.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2025.6.16

UNESCO. (2015). Quality Physical Education (QPE): Guidelines for Policy-Makers. UNESCO.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

Stodden, D. F., Goodway, J. D., Langendorfer, S. J., Roberton, M. A., Rudisill, M. E., Garcia, C., & Garcia, L. E. (2008). A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483582

Barnett, L.M., Lai, S.K., Veldman, S.L. C., Hardy, L.L., Cliff, D.P., Morgan, P.J., Zask, A., Lubans, D.R., & Rush, E. (2016). Correlates of Gross Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine, 46(11), 1663-1688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0495-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0495-z

Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., Prusik, K., & Giovanis, V. (2020). Strength Abilities: Immediate and Delayed Training Effects of Orthogonal Modes of Strength Training in Boys Aged 8 Years. Physical Education Theory and Methodology, 20(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.2.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.2.07

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Ivashchenko, O., Khudolii, O., & Khudolii, M. (2026). Modeling Physical Education as a Learning System: Regional and International Perspectives. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 7(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2026.7.1.01

Issue

Section

Review Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>