Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology https://ltmjournal.com/e <p>The <em>Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology</em> publishes didactic research papers in knowledge, abilities and skills development of children, adolescents, and students, which focus on motor and verbal learning.</p> <p><strong>The purpose of the journal</strong> is to provide scientific information and introduce the results of applied and fundamental research on didactics of motor and verbal learning, secondary and higher education, and learning psychology.</p> <p>Journal for scientists, specialists in didactics, learning psychology, teachers, and lecturers.</p> <p>Three issues per year. Established in 2020</p> <p>eISSN 2708-7581 | ISSN-L 2708-7573</p> OVS LLC en-US Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology 2708-7573 Modeling Physical Education as a Learning System: Regional and International Perspectives https://ltmjournal.com/e/article/view/146 <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Background. </strong>Contemporary learning research increasingly conceptualizes educational processes as controllable, adaptive, and feedback-driven systems. Despite this shift, physical education is often treated as conceptually separate from general learning theory and predominantly interpreted as an applied or norm-oriented activity. Such a reduction limits opportunities for systemic analysis, instructional design, and the integration of formative assessment mechanisms.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Objectives. </strong>The purpose of this article is to reconceptualize physical education as a learning system from the perspective of learning theory and to analyze regional and international approaches to modeling learning processes and pedagogical regulation of learning outcomes.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Materials and Methods. </strong>The study was conducted as a narrative review. Its methodological basis is a conceptual analysis of monographic works and publications in peer-reviewed journals addressing learning process modeling, pedagogical control, adaptive learning, and instructional design in physical education. Source selection followed a conceptually oriented strategy aimed at identifying theoretically and empirically grounded models of learning systems.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Results. </strong>The analysis demonstrates that physical education can be interpreted as a structured learning system comprising learning goals, operationalized outcomes, feedback mechanisms, and regulatory pedagogical decisions. Learning outcomes are conceptualized as dynamic states of learning that change in response to instructional organization. Regional models illustrate how pedagogical control and the classification of learning states can be used to adapt instructional influences under conditions of learner heterogeneity.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Conclusions. </strong>Physical education can be regarded as a legitimate domain of learning theory capable of providing conceptually coherent and empirically grounded examples of controllable and adaptive learning systems. Integrating motor learning within the learning sciences expands opportunities for interdisciplinary analysis of learning processes and contributes to bridging cognitive, procedural, and physical domains of learning.</p> Olha Ivashchenko Oleg Khudolii Mykola Khudolii Copyright (c) 2026 Olha Ivashchenko, Oleg Khudolii, Mykola Khudolii https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-04-30 2026-04-30 7 1 8 16 10.17309/jltm.2026.7.1.01 Epistemological Foundations of Modeling in Motor Action Research: A Narrative Review https://ltmjournal.com/e/article/view/154 <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Background.</strong>&nbsp;Modeling is widely used in motor action research; however, its epistemological role remains insufficiently conceptualized. Existing approaches primarily treat modeling as a descriptive or predictive tool, overlooking its function in scientific knowledge construction.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Purpose.</strong>&nbsp;The aim of this study was to substantiate modeling as an epistemological mechanism of scientific cognition in motor action research and to systematize its key functions in the transition from data to knowledge.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Methods.</strong>&nbsp;A narrative review was conducted based on the analysis of conceptual publications, including author’s works and conference materials, as well as studies addressing general principles of modeling and scientific cognition. The analytical strategy involved reconstruction of conceptual development and identification of epistemic structures underlying modeling processes.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Results.</strong>&nbsp;Modeling is interpreted as a mediated cognitive process that integrates analogy, analysis, synthesis, and formalization. Its epistemic functions include structuring empirical data, reducing uncertainty, establishing relationships between system elements, and enabling the transition from data to information and knowledge. Motor actions are considered as complex, hierarchical systems requiring integrative models that account for biomechanical, physiological, and cognitive components. The concept of biotechnical systems is introduced as a framework for instrumental mediation, enabling synchronized data acquisition, interpretation, and feedback-based control. A conceptual epistemic model of the transition from data to information and knowledge is proposed.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Conclusions.</strong>&nbsp;Modeling should be regarded as a central epistemological mechanism in motor action research, providing a theoretical and methodological basis for understanding, analyzing, and managing complex movement systems.</p> Anatolii Lopatiev Pavol Bartik Mirosława Cieślicka Copyright (c) 2026 Anatolii Lopatiev, Pavol Bartik, Mirosława Cieślicka https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-04-30 2026-04-30 7 1 17 24 10.17309/jltm.2026.7.1.03 Healthy Lifestyle Program to Improve physical literacy and Physical Fitness of Junior High School Students: A Quasi-Experimental Approach https://ltmjournal.com/e/article/view/150 <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Objectives.</strong> This quasi-experimental study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Healthy Lifestyle Program (HLP), integrated into regular physical education classes, in enhancing physical literacy and physical fitness among junior high school students aged 13–14, while addressing sedentary behaviors associated with high screen time and limited outdoor play.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Materials and Methods.</strong> Seventy-two eligible students (mean age = 13.6 ± 0.4 years; 19 males and 17 females per group) were allocated to an experimental group (EXP; <em>n</em> = 36) or a control group (CON; <em>n</em> = 36) using a non-random assignment based on intact classes, consistent with a quasi-experimental design. The EXP group participated in the HLP, which consisted of weekly 80-minute sessions incorporating warm-up activities, motor skill activation, fitness circuits, small-sided games, classroom active breaks, and home-based physical activity assignments at a target intensity of Borg RPE 12–14, complemented by weekly healthy lifestyle education. The CON group followed the standard physical education curriculum. Physical literacy was assessed using the Indonesian-adapted Adolescent Physical Literacy Questionnaire (APLQ; Cronbach’s α = 0.951), and physical fitness was measured using the Indonesian Physical Fitness Test (TKJI; validity = 0.720; reliability = 0.920). Inter-rater reliability was high (APLQ ICC = 0.82; TKJI ICC = 0.88). Program content validity was confirmed using Aiken’s V (0.94). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Shapiro–Wilk tests for normality, Levene’s tests for homogeneity, and MANOVA with partial η² effect sizes.</p> <p style="font-weight: 400;"><strong>Results.</strong> Baseline scores were comparable between groups. The EXP group demonstrated substantial improvements in physical literacy (gain = 24.75 ± 14.52) and physical fitness (gain = 6.94 ± 2.51), whereas the CON group showed minimal change (physical literacy gain = −0.44 ± 2.18; physical fitness gain = 0.08 ± 0.60). MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate effect (Wilks’ Λ = 0.180, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), with large effect sizes for both physical literacy (η² = 0.602) and physical fitness (η² = 0.785). All statistical assumptions were met.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions. </strong><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Healthy Lifestyle Program significantly improved physical literacy and physical fitness among early adolescents. These findings support the integration of educationally grounded, multicomponent lifestyle programs into school curricula, such as <em>Kurikulum Merdeka</em>, to address sedentariness using accessible and contextually appropriate resources. Future research should examine longer intervention durations and more diverse socioeconomic contexts.</span></p> Nevitaningrum Nevitaningrum Pepep Mochamad Syafei Gumilar Mulya Trisnar Adi Prabowo Oktaviarini Yahya Rahmadhanty Putu Deanita I Desta Suryani Copyright (c) 2026 Nevitaningrum Nevitaningrum, Pepep Mochamad Syafei, Gumilar Mulya, Trisnar Adi Prabowo, Oktaviarini Yahya Rahmadhanty, Putu Deanita I Desta Suryani https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-04-30 2026-04-30 7 1 25 36 10.17309/jltm.2026.7.1.02 Beyond Course Averages: A Generalized Bayesian Hierarchical Framework for Course-Level Learning Evaluation https://ltmjournal.com/e/article/view/151 <p><strong>Background. </strong>Course-level learning assessment in higher education is commonly based on comparisons of average performance indicators, implicitly assuming independence across courses and equal reliability of estimates. When enrollments are small and uneven, such approaches produce statistically unstable estimates and exaggerate extreme values, leading to potentially misleading interpretations.</p> <p><strong>Objectives. </strong>This study aims to develop a generalizable methodological framework for applying Bayesian hierarchical modeling (BHM) to course-level learning assessment, explicitly accounting for sampling uncertainty and unequal group sizes.</p> <p><strong>Materials and Methods. </strong>A Bayesian hierarchical model was specified in which student learning outcomes were modeled at the individual level while accounting for course membership. The model decomposes total variance into within-course and between-course components and estimates course-level effects using posterior distributions. Partial pooling was applied to stabilize estimates for courses with small enrollments. An empirical illustration was conducted using anonymized data from 279 students across 22 courses.</p> <p><strong>Results. </strong>Naïve comparisons based on course averages were found to systematically exaggerate extreme outcomes under small sample conditions, resulting in unstable and potentially misleading conclusions. The application of Bayesian hierarchical modeling substantially reduced artificial extremity while preserving statistically supported between-course differences. After pooling, most course effects were not distinguishable from the program average, while a limited number of courses showed consistent deviations.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions.</strong> Bayesian hierarchical modeling provides a statistically robust alternative to descriptive aggregation and course ranking. By incorporating uncertainty and stabilizing estimates, it enables more reliable interpretation of course-level performance and supports targeted, evidence-based academic evaluation.</p> Vicente Montano Archie Reyes Copyright (c) 2026 Vicente Montano, Archie Reyes https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-04-30 2026-04-30 7 1 37 48 10.17309/jltm.2026.7.1.04 Gamified Inclusive Physical Education as an Adaptive Rehabilitation Model for University Students with Blast Traumatic Brain Injury https://ltmjournal.com/e/article/view/155 <div> <p><strong><span lang="UK">Background.</span></strong><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="UK"> </span></span><span lang="UK">The ongoing war in Ukraine has increased the number of university students living with disabilities caused by blast traumatic brain injury (TBI). This situation creates an urgent need for inclusive physical education models that combine rehabilitation goals with effective motivational strategies. Gamification may enhance participation, adherence, and functional recovery within adaptive learning environments.</span></p> </div> <div> <p><strong><span lang="UK">Objectives.</span></strong><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="UK"> </span></span><span lang="UK">The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a gamified inclusive physical education program as an adaptive rehabilitation model for university students with blast traumatic brain injury.</span></p> </div> <div> <p><strong><span lang="UK">Materials and Methods.</span></strong><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="UK"> </span></span><span lang="UK">Twenty-eight first-year male students aged 18–23 years with mild blast TBI and mild functional impairment participated in the study. Participants were divided into a control group (n = 14) and an experimental group (n = 14). The control group followed a standard inclusive physical education program, while the experimental group completed a vestibular rehabilitation program integrated with gamification elements. The intervention lasted two academic semesters. Functional changes were assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and the Figure-of-8 Walk Test. Data were processed using descriptive statistics and Student’s t-test.</span></p> </div> <div> <p><strong><span lang="UK">Results.</span></strong><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="UK"> </span></span><span lang="UK">At baseline, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups (p &gt; .05). After the intervention, the experimental group demonstrated substantially greater improvements than the control group across all indicators. Gains in the experimental group ranged from 15.3% to 22.1%, while changes in the control group did not exceed 5.7%. The largest effects were observed in walking efficiency, balance control, and coordination performance.</span></p> </div> <div><strong><span lang="UK">Conclusions. </span></strong><span lang="UK">Gamified inclusive physical education can be considered an effective adaptive rehabilitation model for university students with blast traumatic brain injury. The integration of structured physical exercises with motivational game mechanics improved functional outcomes, engagement, and movement confidence. The findings support the use of gamification in inclusive university physical education under conditions of increased rehabilitation demand.</span></div> Oksana Blavt Gennadii Iedynak Yan Bezhrebelny Copyright (c) 2026 Oksana Blavt, Gennadii Iedynak, Yan Bezhrebelny https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 2026-04-30 2026-04-30 7 1 49 56 10.17309/jltm.2026.7.1.05