Didactics: Peculiarities of Programmed Teaching of a Cartwheel to Boys Aged 14

Alyona Suprun; Olha Ivashchenko; Mirosława Cieślicka

doi:10.17309/jltm.2021.3.04

Authors

Alyona Suprun H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9885-284X
Olha Ivashchenko H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2708-5636
Mirosława Cieślicka Collegium Medicum: Bydgoszcz, Kujawsko Pomorskie https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0407-2592

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2021.3.04

Keywords:

programmed training, acrobatic exercises, guys

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the peculiarities of programmed teaching of a cartwheel to boys aged 14.

Material and methods. The study participants were 20 boys aged 14. The children and their parents were fully informed about all the features of the study and gave their consent to participate in the experiment. To solve the tasks set, the following research methods were used: study and analysis of scientific and methodological literature; pedagogical observation, timing of training tasks; pedagogical experiment, methods of mathematical statistics, factor analysis.

Results. The analysis of similarities revealed that the program components are interrelated. Series of training tasks I, II and IV are combined into one group and provide conditions for teaching boys aged 14 a cartwheel.

Conclusions. As a result of factor analysis, the study obtained a two-factor model of the teaching program where training tasks are closely connected with one another, which indicates their effective selection. Factor models of the teaching program explain 69.371% and 75.394% of the variation of results. The study found that the effectiveness of the program depends on the modes of exercise repetition. The use of the mode of exercise repetition of 6 sets 2 times each with a rest interval of 60 s increases the effectiveness of the proposed program (p <0.05).

Author Biographies

Alyona Suprun, H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

Department of Theory and Methodology of Physical Education,
Alchevskykh St, 29, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
alyonasuprun1987@gmail.com

Olha Ivashchenko, H. S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University

Department of Theory and Methodology of Physical Education,
Alchevskykh St, 29, Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
ivashchenko@hnpu.edu.ua

Mirosława Cieślicka, Collegium Medicum: Bydgoszcz, Kujawsko Pomorskie

Chodkiewicza St, 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
cudaki@op.pl

References

Maehr, M. L. (1964). Programed learning and the role of the teacher. Journal of Educational Research, 57(10), 554-556. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1964.10883149

Newton, J. M., & Hickey, A. E. (1965). Sequence effects in programed learning of a verbal concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(3), 140-147. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022020

Woodruff, A. B., Faltz, C., & Wagner, D. (1966). Effects of learner characteristics on programed learning performance. Psychology in the Schools, 3(1), 72-77. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(196601)3:1<72::AID-PITS2310030120>3.0.CO;2-P

Hughes, D. C. (1975). Programmed Learning and Conventional Teaching. Educational Research, 18(1), 54-61. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188750180107

Coughlan, P., & Coghlan, D. (2021). What happens to P? Lessons from network action learning research. Action Learning: Research and Practice, 18(2), 91-101. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2021.1884044

Johnson, C., Iversen, I., Kenyon, P., Holth, P., & de Souza, D. G. (2020). Murray Sidman: A life of giving. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1290-1298. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.718

Shlemin, A.M. (1973). Iunyi gimnast. M.: Fizkultura i sport, 376.

Kapkan, O., Khudolii, O., & Bartik, P. (2019). Motor Skills Development: Optimization of Teaching Boys Aged 14. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 19(3), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.3.06

Khudolii, O., & Iermakov, S. (2011). Zakonomirnosti protsesu navchannia yunykh himnastiv.Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, (5), 3-18, 35. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2011.5.707

Ivashchenko, O. (2001). Metodyka navchannia himnastychnykh vprav shkilnoi prohramy. Teoriia ta metodyka fizychnoho vykhovannia, (1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2001.1.7

Khudolii, O.M. (2008). Osnovy metodyky vykladannia himnastyky: Navch. posibnyk. U 2-kh tomakh. 4-e vyd., vypr. i dop. Kharkiv: «OVS», T. 1, 408.

Ivashchenko, V. (2014). Osnovy teorii ta metodyky prohramovanoho navchannia rukhovym diiam. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, (3), 29-33. https://tmfv.com.ua/journal/article/view/133

Khudolii, O., Iermakov, S., & Bartik, P. (2020). Didactics: Methodological Basis of Motor Learning in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 1(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2020.1.01

Khudolii, O., Ivashchenko, O., & Titarenko, A. (2013). Osoblyvosti prohramuvannia rozvytku syly u khlopchykiv molodshykh klasiv. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, (3), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2013.3.1020

Kapkan, O., Khudolii, O., & Bartik, P. (2019). Pattern Recognition: Motor Skills Development in Girls Aged 15. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 19(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2019.1.06

Ivashchenko, O. (2020). Research Program: Modeling of Motor Abilities Development and Teaching of Schoolchildren. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, 20(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2020.1.05

Khudolii, O., & Iermakov, S. (2011). Zakonomirnosti protsesu navchannia yunykh himnastiv. Teorìâ ta Metodika Fìzičnogo Vihovannâ, (5), 3-18, 35. https://doi.org/10.17309/tmfv.2011.5.707

Gaverdovskii, Iu.K. (2003). O kauzalnoi strukture sportivnykh dvizhenii. Teoriia i praktika fiz. kultury, (2), 14-19.

Gaverdovskii, Iu.K. (2007). Obuchenie sportivnym uprazhneniiam. Biomekhanika. Metodologiia. Didaktika. M.: Fizkultura i sport, 912.

Buckolz, E., Renger, R., Salmoni, A., Hall, C., & Paunonen, S. V. (1990). Error recognition ability and the retention of rapid timing movements. Human Movement Science, 9(1), 3-21. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90032-9

Féry, Y.-A., & Morizot, P. (2000). Kinesthetic and visual image in modeling closed motor skills: The example of the tennis serve. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90(3), 707-722. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.90.3.707

Ashford, D., Bennett, S. J., & Davids, K. (2006). Observational modeling effects for movement dynamics and movement outcome measures across differing task constraints: A meta-analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38(3), 185-205. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.38.3.185-205

Karabourniotis, D., Evaggelinou, C., Tzetzis, G., & Kourtessis, T. (2002). Curriculum enrichment with self-testing activities in development of fundamental movement skills of first-grade children in Greece. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94(3 PART 2), 1259-1270. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.94.3c.1259

Lakota, R., Talović, M., Jelešković, E., & Bonacin, D. (2008). The effects of the programmed training on the transformation of the qualitative level in the situational-motor skills with handball players aged 11-14. Sport Science, 1(2), 60-64. Scopus.

Park, I., & Buchanan, J. J. (2018). Motor Skill Learning and the Development of Visual Perception Processes Supporting Action Identification. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(5), 566-578. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1378995

Smyth, M. M. (1978). Attention to visual feedback in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10(3), 185-190. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1978.10735152

Robertson, R., Germain, L. S., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2018). The effects of self-observation when combined with a skilled model on the learning of gymnastics skills. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 6(1), 18-34. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0027