Determining the Validity and Reliability of ArtSci-S.P.D. Module On Year 5 Human Circulatory System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2024.5.3.05Keywords:
science-art integration, learning module, validity, reliability, test-retest reliability, Pearson’s correlationAbstract
Objectives. The study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the developed art-integration in science learning module, named ArtSci-S.P.D. Implementing the module has been carried out in order to ensure its suitability for using in further research.
Materials and methods. The analysis approach for face validity was Fleiss’ kappa, while the content validity index (CVI) was employed to assess content validity, and the test-retest reliability method was used for measuring reliability. The calculation of test-retest reliability was performed by using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Results. The findings show a positive tendency for evaluating the face and content validity (Fleiss’ kappa, k = 0.66; CVI > 0.78). Additionally, the module exhibits a high coefficient of reliability (r = 0.87).
Conclusions. Thus, the module has been considered to be a valid and reliable tool for using in the actual study, thereby underscoring its efficacy.
Downloads
References
Munawaroh, M., Ratnawati, E., Ningsih, T. Z., & Nuryana, N. (2022). Enhancing Students’ Communication Skills in Social Studies Learning Through Cooperative Learning. Ta’dib, 25(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v25i1.5826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v25i1.5826
Sudarman, S., & Ardian, A. (2021). The development of interactive module to support student centered learning. Akademika, 10(01), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.34005/akademika.v10i01.1344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34005/akademika.v10i01.1344
Balakrishnan, B., Azman, M. N. A., Sharif, A. M., Yaacob, M. I. H., Zain, H. H. M., & Parmin, N. (2019). The effectiveness of Hands-On Modules in Learning Science: a case study in Malaysia. The International Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Learning, 26(1), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/cgp/v26i01/21-29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v26i01/21-29
The Star (2023). Students lose interest in science, maths due to weak foundation, say dons. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/08/13/students-lose-interest-in-science-maths-due-to-weak-foundation-say-dons
The Straits Times (2021). Forum: Reduce syllabus so that students don’t need tuition to play catch-up. https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/forum/forum-reduce-syllabus-so-that-students-dont-need-tuition-to-play-catch-up
Mahamod, Z. & Somasundram, B. (2017). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on the achievement and motivation of the student in learning Malay language. Creative Education, 8(15), 2438-2454. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.815167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.815167
Yashinsky, D. (2023). 20 Standardized Tests Pros and Cons. [Online article]. Helpful Professor. https://helpfulprofessor.com/standardized-test-pros-cons/
Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., Nachiappan, S., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Cognitive Factors on Learning, Motivation, and Career in Malaysia’s STEM Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 1669-1684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17227
Ferlazzo, L. (2021, July 19). Four Good Science Teaching Strategies & How to Use Them. [Online article]. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-four-good-science-teaching-strategies-how-to-use-them/2021/07
Hennessey, B. A. (2019). Motivation and creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed). 374-395. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.020
Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6
Hartikainen, S., Rintala, H., Pylväs, L., & Nokelainen, P. (2019). The Concept of Active Learning and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: A Review of Research in Engineering Higher Education. Education Sciences, 9(4), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040276
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Lawrence, R., Lim, F. C., & Haslinda, A. (2019). Strengths and weaknesses of education 4.0 in the higher education institution. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(2S3), 511-519. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.b1122.1292s319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.B1122.1292S319
Ling, N. K., Samsudin, S., Saad, M. I. M., Daud, A. N. M., Rahim, N. S. A., Arif, H. A., & Jusoh, N. (2024). Development of Malaysian Science Standard Document for Teaching Year Four Student according to Neoteric Approach Curriculum: A Concept Paper. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(2), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.1801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.1801
Dewey, J. (1988). Experience and education. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works 1925-1953: Vol 13, 1938-1939 (pp. 1-62). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Masuwai, A., Zulkifli, H., & Hamzah, M. I. (2024a). Evaluation of content validity and face validity of secondary school Islamic education teacher self-assessment instrument. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2308410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308410
Sundram, S., & Romli, N. (2023). A pilot study to test the reliability and validity of the research instrument. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 8(3), e002149. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i3.2149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i3.2149
Sürücü, L., & Maslakçi, A. (2020). Validity And Reliability In Quantitative Research. Business and Management Studies an International Journal, 8(3), 2694-2726. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument: How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire Survey in a Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5, 28-36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Sudaryono, N., Rahardja, U., Aini, Q., Graha, Y. I., & Lutfiani, N. (2019). Validity of test instruments. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1364(1), 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1364/1/012050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1364/1/012050
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Chua, Y. L., Balakrishnan, B., Chai, V. C., & Koh, Y. Y. (2020). Assessing the validity and reliability of creative thinking skills module in a pilot study on engineering undergraduate in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol10.1.9.2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol10.1.9.2020
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378-382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). The measurement of interrater agreement. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 598-626. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471445428.ch18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471445428.ch18
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Moustafa, M. A. (2020). The development and validation of a module on enhancing students’ critical thinking, collaboration and writing skills. SAR Journal - Science and Research, 3(4), 166-177. https://doi.org/10.18421/sar34-04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/SAR34-04
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Co
May, Y. S., & Ahmad, N. A. (2018). Efficacy of Doctor WoRM’s module for year four low achievers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 1576-1585. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/5314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/5314
Cronk, B.C. (2024). How to Use SPSS®: A Step-By-Step Guide to Analysis and Interpretation (12th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003450467
Kennedy, I. (2022). Sample size determination in Test-Retest and Cronbach Alpha Reliability Estimates. British Journal of Contemporary Education, 2(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.52589/bjce-fy266hk9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCE-FY266HK9
Oktavia, R., Irwandi, N., Rajibussalim, N., Mentari, M., & Mulia, I. S. (2018). Assessing the validity and reliability of questionnaires on the implementation of Indonesian curriculum K-13 in STEM education. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1088. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012014
Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation Coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kai Ling Ng, Syakirah Samsudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
