Considering the Impact of Using Free-Body Diagram in Mechanics Problem-Solving on Improving Engineering Students’ Performance in Physics at a Selected Public University in Rwanda

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2024.5.3.04

Keywords:

mechanics, engineering, problem-solving, free-body diagram

Abstract

Background. Engineering students often struggle with physics problem-solving, especially mechanics problems, while teaching mechanics helps students predict motion and force impacts, enabling creative engineering design tasks. Problem-solving in mechanics involves using free-body diagrams, visual aids that identify objects and forces, determine appropriate approaches, and reduce information. The free-body diagram technique is crucial for understanding the principles of mechanics, as it helps distinguish between cause and effect, as well as focusing on the practical implementation of mechanics concepts. 

Objectives. The current study aimed to examine the impact of free-body diagrams on engineering students’ physics performance at a selected public university in Rwanda, highlighting cognitive load theory and constructivist learning theory’s role in improving problem-solving abilities and understanding mechanics concepts. 

Materials and methods. A sample of 68 students was purposively selected to participate in this study. Prior to the intervention, engineering students were given a pre-test to evaluate their ability to use free-body diagrams in solving mechanics problems. The experimental group underwent a four-week intervention, during which they were taught to draw free-body diagrams, identify external forces, and find force components. The data was collected through achievement tests and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics 25. 

Results. The study findings revealed that incorporating free-body diagrams into mechanics problem-solving improved significantly (p < 0.001) engineering students’ performance in physics. 

Conclusions. The study recommends incorporating free-body diagrams into the physics instructional curriculum to enhance student’ understanding of basic subjects, practice problem-solving skills, and offer extra support for struggling students. Further research is needed to ascertain the impact of this approach on other physics fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Theogene Niyomufasha, University of Rwanda-College of Education (UR-CE)

African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS), Rwanda
theogniyo@gmail.com

Celestin Ntivuguruzwa, University of Rwanda-College of Education (UR-CE)

African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS), Rwanda
ntivuguruzwacelestin1@gmail.com

Leon Rugema Mugabo, University of Rwanda-College of Education (UR-CE)

African Centre of Excellence for Innovative Teaching and Learning Mathematics and Science (ACEITLMS), Rwanda
mugabol20000@yahoo.com

References

Niyomufasha, T., Ntivuguruzwa, C., & Mugabo, L. (2024a). Effect of using multiple representations in teaching mechanics problem-solving on engineering students’ academic performance in Rwanda. Physics Education, 59(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad4944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad4944

Thabit, A. K., Mater, A. N., & Al-nami, A. (2016). A study of the effect of student utilization of the free- body diagram on their performance. International Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 4(1), 577-582.

Rosengrant, D., Van Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. (2009). Do students use and understand free-body diagrams? Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010108

Kraige, J. L., & Meriam, L. G. (2012). Engineering mechanics: dynamics (7th Editio). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://surl.li/fwcqx

Taasoobshirazi, G., Heddy, B. C., Danielson, R. W., Abraham, E. R. I., & Joji, S. (2022). Understanding Students’ Free-Body Diagrams Using the Metarepresentations Survey for Physics. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 3(3), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2022.3.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2022.3.01

Mccarthy, T. J., & Goldfinch, T. (2010). Teaching the concept of free body diagrams. Proceedings of 2010 AaeE Conference, Lane 1993, 454-460.

Leipold, K. N., & Ivancic, S. R. (2018). Efforts to Improve Free Body Diagrams. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30365

Lucas, L. L., & Lewis, E. B. (2019). High school students’ use of representations in physics problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 119(6), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12357

Vanes, M., Mahmutovi, S., & Hasovi, E. (2017). Free-Body Diagrams and Problem Solving in Mechanics : An Example of The Effectiveness of Self-Constructed Representations. European J of Physics Education, 7(3), 53-67.

Rosengrant, D., Heuvelen, A. Van, & Etkina, E. (2006). Case Study: Students ’ Use of Multiple Representations in Problem Solving. Physics Education Research Conference, 49-53.

Davis, J. A., & Lorimer, S. (2018). Student performance on drawing free body diagrams and the effect on problem solving. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018-June. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-31013

Nguyen, D., & Rebello, N. S. (2011). Students’ Difficulties With Multiple Representations in Introductory Mechanics. US-China Education Review, 8(5), 559–569.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving : Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory : implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, 55. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Mešić, V., Mahmutović, S., Hasović, E., & Erceg, N. (2017). Free-Body Diagrams and Problem Solving in Mechanics : An Example of The Effectiveness of Self-Constructed Representations. European J of Physics Education, 7(3), 53-67.

Mccarthy, T. J., & Goldfinch, T. (2012). Assessing students understanding of the concept of free body diagrams using online tests. Edulearn 4th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 1-10.

Aviani, I., Erceg, N., & Mešić, V. (2015). Drawing and using free body diagrams: Why it may be better not to decompose forces. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020137

Aini, F. N., Sutopo, & Suyudi, A. (2021). Teaching integrated Newton ’ s laws of motion for high school students. AIP Conference Proceedings 2330, 050013, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043193

Kohl, P. B., Rosengrant, D., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2007). Strongly and weakly directed approaches to teaching multiple representation use in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010108

Rosengrant, D., Heuvelen, A. Van, & Etkina, E. (2005a). Case Study: Students’ Use of Multiple Representations in Problem Solving. AIP Conference Proceedings. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2177020

Rosengrant, D., Heuvelen, A. Van, & Etkina, E. (2005b). Free-Body Diagrams: Necessary or Sufficient ? 2004 Physics Education Research Conference, 177-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2084730

Taasoobshirazi, G., & Farley, J. (2013). A multivariate model of physics problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.001

Mešić, V., Mahmutović, S., Hasović, E., & Nataša, E. (2017). Free-Body Diagrams and Problem Solving in Mechanics: An Example of The Effectiveness of Self-Constructed Representations. European J of Physics Education, 7(3), 53-67.

Sorby, S. A., & Duffy, G. (2022). An Evaluation of the Relationship between Spatial Skills and Creating a Free Body Diagram.

Niyomufasha, T., Ntivuguruzwa, C., & Mugabo, L. R. (2024b). The engineering students’ use of multiple representations in mechanics problems solving at a selected public university in Rwanda. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2372941 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2372941

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Niyomufasha, T., Ntivuguruzwa, C., & Mugabo, L. R. (2024). Considering the Impact of Using Free-Body Diagram in Mechanics Problem-Solving on Improving Engineering Students’ Performance in Physics at a Selected Public University in Rwanda. Journal of Learning Theory and Methodology, 5(3), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.17309/jltm.2024.5.3.04

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Articles